Compare · RealUptime Status

RealUptime Status vs Hyperping

Hyperping bundles uptime monitoring, status pages, and on-call into one product. Its own documentation says a check rotates through your selected regions one region at a time per minute, and a failure is double-checked from the other selected regions before an outage opens. RealUptime Status checks and shows four named regions together on every check by default, every tier.

The short version

10 regions read simultaneously vs one region per minute in rotation.

Hyperping's own documentation describes its check mechanism as one region checked per minute on rotation, with a failure double-checked from other selected regions only after it is first seen. RealUptime Status checks and publishes four named regions together on every check by default, on every tier including Free, so a single-region disagreement is visible on the page as it happens rather than resolved by a follow-up confirmation pass. Hyperping covers more monitor types today (ping, SSL expiry, and browser checks alongside DNS, TCP, and cron) and adds native phone call paging from its Pro plan; RealUptime Status routes each escalation step through email, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Opsgenie, PagerDuty, Zapier, or webhook instead. Those are real differences in product scope, not claims that either roadmap is fixed.

Start free: 10 monitors

Verified August 10, 2026. Sources: Hyperping pricing, Hyperping datacenter regions documentation, Hyperping uptime monitoring product page, Hyperping features page.

Multiple named regions shown together per check

Have

4 named regions checked and shown together by default, configurable down per monitor

Don’t have

rotates one region at a time per minute; a failure is double-checked from other selected regions before alerting, per their own docs

Free tier

Have

10 monitors, 10 regions, $0/mo

Have

20 monitors, 1 status page (no custom domain), $0/mo

Check interval minimum

Have

1 minute on Free and Growth, 30 seconds on Scale

Partial

5 minutes on Free; 30 seconds from Essentials ($29/mo), 20 seconds on Business ($299/mo)

Monitor types beyond HTTP(S)

Partial

TCP and TLS port checks, DNS record checks, and heartbeat/cron push monitoring, plus HTTP(S) endpoints

Have

DNS, TCP port, ICMP ping, SSL expiry, cron heartbeat, and Playwright browser checks, per their own docs

Status-page custom domain with HTTPS

Have

Growth and Scale, automatic TLS

Have

from Essentials ($29/mo); not included on Free

Team access

Have

owner, admin and responder roles

Have

2 seats included on Essentials, additional seats billed per user

On-call and incident response

Have

escalation policies with acknowledgement and on-call rotations, on Growth and Scale; each escalation step pages a person (email plus their chosen channels) or a channel: Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Opsgenie, PagerDuty, Zapier, or webhook; no native phone call or SMS

Have

on-call and escalation policies from Essentials; phone call alerts from Pro

REST API

Have

Growth and Scale

Have

from Essentials; not included on Free

Webhook notifications

Have

HMAC-signed, every tier including Free

Not published

webhook support is listed as a feature, but which tier includes it is not specified on their pricing page

Public subscriber notifications

Have

every tier including Free

Have

100 subscribers on Essentials, rising by tier to unlimited on Business

Looking for a Hyperping alternative?

For the reasoning behind checking from more than one region at all, see why a status page can show all green during a real outage. Comparing more than just this one alternative? The status page tool checklist covers what to test before committing to any of them.

Start free: 10 monitors